Categories
Antiwork

What would be the consequences of legislation requiring companies to make raises and promotions public (to a certain extent)?

Do you guys think that making raise and promotion information (partially) available to the public/workforce would advocate for the rights of the laborer? As someone who is curious about antiwork philosophy I had this thought while questioning if labor rights can be properly represented under the current conditions that the United States operates under. Obviously certain precautions would need to be taken in order to protect the privacy of laborers, but in my mind a company’s various forms of competition deserve to know if a person is not being properly compensated/promoted for the work and experience with which they provide to the labor force, and consequently they should have the opportunity to recognize that and provide more accurate compensation for their work. What are your thoughts?


Do you guys think that making raise and promotion information (partially) available to the public/workforce would advocate for the rights of the laborer? As someone who is curious about antiwork philosophy I had this thought while questioning if labor rights can be properly represented under the current conditions that the United States operates under. Obviously certain precautions would need to be taken in order to protect the privacy of laborers, but in my mind a company’s various forms of competition deserve to know if a person is not being properly compensated/promoted for the work and experience with which they provide to the labor force, and consequently they should have the opportunity to recognize that and provide more accurate compensation for their work. What are your thoughts?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.