With no urgency to support governmental/civil philosophies/systems which unctuously simulate healthful considerations towards human wellness, while effectuating any degree of acceptance towards poverty and systems of “justice” which punish those who became detached from generalized labor/economic systems, as a result of such systems not satiating their individual/group needs, I am not willing to exhaust myself in reeducating those who are combatively reluctant to perceive such predicaments as anything other than a normality in such a technologically advanced civilization.
Penury and associated vicissitudes are an intense violation of human freedoms, and there isn’t anything that can convince me that someone would defy their survival instincts to avoid labor participation as a result of Sloth. The medical and education systems fail these individuals, the labor and economic demands are too excessive for these individuals, until they are dehumanized and wholly excluded from society and still suffer such systemic failures, while civil/governmental members rarely acknowledge them and their needs, and more often christen them as “lazy”, without giving them any opportunity to effectively/coherently elucidate their circumstances.
If societal conditions were less hostile and oppressive in regards to finances and deindividualization, is it possible that criminal behaviors/organizations would be less likely to develop or be looked towards as an analog of achieving individual and financial security in such societies? Restraining and segregating hostile individuals is an effective method of maintaining order within a jurisdiction, though, I don’t think it’s honest to uphold oppressive systems and proceed to apprehend and punish those who cannot survive by subjugating to such systems.