It’s honestly tempting
So basically everyone related to me is a lawyer, and one of the most helpful pieces of information they ever gave me is so simple, and would maybe make a difference in a lot of the situations I’m reading about here. When someone hands you a form to sign, of course read it. They have no business asking you to sign anything without giving you time to read it, right? If there’s something on that form you don’t like, you can cross it out and still sign the form. Put a line through it, initial it to indicate that you are the one who made the change, and then go ahead and sign. You can’t be held responsible for agreeing to that part of the contract. Specifically as this applies to work, when you’re being onboarded you have a billionty forms to read and sign, and obviously most people don’t…
Leeches of the world unite!
Admit it, all of you are just lazy, selfish, spoiled, and privileged children. You have no motivation, no ambition, and add no value to society. Your parents should've disciplined you instead of ignoring you. Even they didn't love you, so why expect anyone else too?
Do we still hate him?
Fuck work!
You know if no one is working the world would come to an end. Electricity, gone. Gas, gone, etc. Half of you probably rent so guess what everything positive about your life is gone. You’re all losers.
What if all CEOs/CTOs/CFOs/Upper Management were required to present a proof of work to justify their salaries, or even have their salaries be a function of the proof of work? Using a similar concept to the proof of work in a block chain, you could require higher level positions to author papers that in a quantifiable way justify that their decisions led to the company profiting. These papers, much like any academic paper, would need to be peer-reviewed by orthogonal entities that are not tied to the organization, e.g. it would have to be submitted and reviewed by an anonymous committee. The paper would need to be either exclusively authored by the person in question, or if multiple contributors are present (presuming all are within the org) their corresponding work would reduce the perceived contribution of the individual in question. For ground-level employees, this has long been the case, but…