Categories
Antiwork

Why only 96? Because the Government is not Actually interested in allowing us to work remotely.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/nwt-government-remote-work-policy-1.6706598 “CBC News asked the Finance department for an interview about the low number of remote work arrangements, but didn’t get one.” I can almost guarantee that would be because most of those 96 are actually working remotely for Duty To Accommodate which requires a medical prognosis. All 3 ppl I know are all actually DTA’s and then one that just works from the office from their home community. So that 96 is actually probably 0 that are on real work from home.


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/nwt-government-remote-work-policy-1.6706598

“CBC News asked the Finance department for an interview about the low number of remote work arrangements, but didn’t get one.” I can almost guarantee that would be because most of those 96 are actually working remotely for Duty To Accommodate which requires a medical prognosis. All 3 ppl I know are all actually DTA’s and then one that just works from the office from their home community. So that 96 is actually probably 0 that are on real work from home.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *