from a 1%er's perspective, does it make sense to let most of us die or incapacitate in the future to even out the difference of all the free time we'll have as things get automated and the imbalance of our current system's ability to keep us all fed and housed after that loss of income
like hopefully (from their pov) we will die out from disease and accelerated climate destruction and all the stress of fighting for a position in a constantly shrinking body of available jobs? like the job search today is already a joke (despite the uneven distribution of skills; we can only migrate to lesser automated or outdated jobs before even those become scarce due to the colliding intersection of robotics and ai