I work for a big government agency. In stand-up yesterday, our boss told us the VP had been approached by HR saying “someone in his organization” was abusing their WFH privileges to goof off. (The VP organization is about one to two hundred people in technology roles). This was based on an “anonymous letter” sent to HR accusing an unidentified person. As a result, our group's WFH status is imperiled, and we're getting extra weird restrictions (like turning on camera during Zoom is now mandatory).
I'll never know, but would anybody want to bet on whether this is a false flag attack?