Categories
Antiwork

Research: CEO job stability due to boards’ bad governance

I find three main results. First, to rationalize the observed rate of forced turnover, boards must behave as if firing the CEO costs shareholders 5.9% of the firm’s assets, or $236 million for the median firm. Second, this cost mainly reflects CEO entrenchment and bad governance rather than a real cost for shareholders”


I find three main
results. First, to rationalize the observed rate of forced turnover, boards must behave as if firing the CEO
costs shareholders 5.9% of the firm’s assets, or $236 million for the median firm. Second, this cost mainly
reflects CEO entrenchment and bad governance rather than a real cost for shareholders”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *